GeekHobbies.com

Vonage Voice and Fax Review

Filed under: Phones, Reviews — Tony March 16, 2007 @ 9:10 am
del.icio.us:Vonage Voice and Fax Review digg:Vonage Voice and Fax Review spurl:Vonage Voice and Fax Review wists:Vonage Voice and Fax Review simpy:Vonage Voice and Fax Review newsvine:Vonage Voice and Fax Review blinklist:Vonage Voice and Fax Review furl:Vonage Voice and Fax Review reddit:Vonage Voice and Fax Review fark:Vonage Voice and Fax Review blogmarks:Vonage Voice and Fax Review Y!:Vonage Voice and Fax Review smarking:Vonage Voice and Fax Review magnolia:Vonage Voice and Fax Review segnalo:Vonage Voice and Fax Review gifttagging:Vonage Voice and Fax Review

vonage.gif

I’ve used Vonage for voice since August, 2004. Voice was okay; it was never great. There was always some delay/latency. Sometimes it wasn’t really noticeable, and other times it was very distracting–it seemed like a whole second between the time you spoke and the time the other person heard you speak. You’d be surprised how awkward that makes conversation, because you’ll often be inadvertently interrupting the person you’re speaking to, and you won’t realize it for a second.

I decided that I needed some Quality of Service (QoS) so I replaced my router with one of these D-Link GamerLounge routers. That series of routers has a much more aggressive QoS than other routers, because it will constantly break large, lower-priority packets into smaller segments. See, while QoS will prioritize realtime traffic like Voice over IP (VoIP) over traffic like Web transfers (say, HTTP and FTP), it can only prioritize queued traffic. That helps, but if the router is in the middle of transferring a large packet, it can’t be interrupted with a VoIP packet, and the VoIP packet has to wait the few milliseconds it takes to transmit the large, lower-priority packet. The GamerLounge routers minimize this effect by fragmenting all large, low-priority outbound packets so that the interruption will be less.

The GamerLounge router did a good job of reducing the latency. Unfortunately, the model I had was awful at handling VPN traffic. When my wife started working from home regularly, this caused real problems for her. So, I upgraded to a D-Link Xtreme N Router. It has QoS, but it doesn’t do the fragmenting thing, so the voice delay got worse again.

In December of 2004 I added a fax line to my Vonage service. Before that, I had been using one of those eFax services. That’s great for receiving faxes, but I don’t receive many faxes. Mostly, I need to send signed contracts. It turns out that the quality problems with voice, while annoying, absolutely kill fax services. Most fax transmissions died after 2-3 pages, requiring me to send contracts in multiple calls. Nonetheless, I don’t fax that often, and I’m lazy, so I just dealt with it.

This week I finally reverted back to a Verizon land-line to use for faxes. I’m faxing more regularly now, and I need it to be reliable. Vonage made cancelling my fax line an absolute nightmare. While I added the line with just a few clicks on their website, they forced me to call them to cancel the service (just like every other online service, they want to make it difficult–I’m talking to you, Sirius). Then, they tried to convince me to keep the service at a discount, convert it to a virtual number, convert it to a second voice line, convert it to a virtual number (they asked me this twice), etc.

Well, that’s my experience with Vonage. I continue to use their voice service because I don’t make many voice calls and it’s only about $18/month. My favorite Vonage feature is that it rings my cell phone at the same time, so I don’t have to give people separate office and cell numbers–one number contacts me even when I’m not in the office.

Share your own experiences in the comments.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment